Comments on: Pistol Round Comparison http://snarkybytes.com/2009/11/28/pistol-round-comparison/ Mon, 21 May 2012 18:05:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: julie http://snarkybytes.com/2009/11/28/pistol-round-comparison/#comment-1488 julie Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:29:38 +0000 http://snarkybytes.com/?p=4656#comment-1488 Neat .... Neat ….

]]> By: Ride Fast http://snarkybytes.com/2009/11/28/pistol-round-comparison/#comment-1487 Ride Fast Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:50:47 +0000 http://snarkybytes.com/?p=4656#comment-1487 Every news room in America should print out that awesome image and post it in every, <i>cough</i>, reporters cubicle. Maybe that would convince them there are calibers other than milli 9. Every news room in America should print out that awesome image and post it in every, cough, reporters cubicle. Maybe that would convince them there are calibers other than milli 9.

]]> By: D2k http://snarkybytes.com/2009/11/28/pistol-round-comparison/#comment-1486 D2k Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:31:18 +0000 http://snarkybytes.com/?p=4656#comment-1486 Pretty sure that's from Drake's massive collection of cartridges http://www.youtube.com/user/DrakeGmbH Pretty sure that’s from Drake’s massive collection of cartridges http://www.youtube.com/user/DrakeGmbH

]]> By: Tam http://snarkybytes.com/2009/11/28/pistol-round-comparison/#comment-1485 Tam Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:38:28 +0000 http://snarkybytes.com/?p=4656#comment-1485 That .455 Webley round is informative. With that fat, heavy conical bullet sporting such a distinct rearward weight bias, its yaw rate must have been impressive. I'll bet it swapped ends within an inch of impact... That .455 Webley round is informative.

With that fat, heavy conical bullet sporting such a distinct rearward weight bias, its yaw rate must have been impressive. I’ll bet it swapped ends within an inch of impact…

]]> By: SayUncle » Coolest pic you’ll see today http://snarkybytes.com/2009/11/28/pistol-round-comparison/#comment-1484 SayUncle » Coolest pic you’ll see today Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:05:43 +0000 http://snarkybytes.com/?p=4656#comment-1484 [...] Comparison of pistol rounds. [...] [...] Comparison of pistol rounds. [...]

]]> By: Old NFO http://snarkybytes.com/2009/11/28/pistol-round-comparison/#comment-1483 Old NFO Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:42:33 +0000 http://snarkybytes.com/?p=4656#comment-1483 Interesting, never seen it ordered that way. Not a clue where/why either... :-) Interesting, never seen it ordered that way. Not a clue where/why either… :-)

]]> By: Borepatch http://snarkybytes.com/2009/11/28/pistol-round-comparison/#comment-1482 Borepatch Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:10:10 +0000 http://snarkybytes.com/?p=4656#comment-1482 I agree with JohnOC, but it's entirely awesome anyway. I agree with JohnOC, but it’s entirely awesome anyway.

]]> By: Ufda http://snarkybytes.com/2009/11/28/pistol-round-comparison/#comment-1481 Ufda Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:18:21 +0000 http://snarkybytes.com/?p=4656#comment-1481 They're sorted roughly by overall length. There's also a rifle one: http://imgur.com/7fMvn.jpg I'm unsure of the original source either. I thought I first saw them on wikipedia, but couldn't find the cite. They’re sorted roughly by overall length. There’s also a rifle one: http://imgur.com/7fMvn.jpg

I’m unsure of the original source either. I thought I first saw them on wikipedia, but couldn’t find the cite.

]]> By: JohnOC http://snarkybytes.com/2009/11/28/pistol-round-comparison/#comment-1480 JohnOC Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:49:37 +0000 http://snarkybytes.com/?p=4656#comment-1480 Curious choices in sorting order. Curious choices in sorting order.

]]>