<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Vaccination movement founder: dishonest and irresponsible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://snarkybytes.com/2010/01/29/anti-vaccination-movement-founder-dishonest-and-irresponsible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://snarkybytes.com/2010/01/29/anti-vaccination-movement-founder-dishonest-and-irresponsible/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Ditz</title>
		<link>http://snarkybytes.com/2010/01/29/anti-vaccination-movement-founder-dishonest-and-irresponsible/#comment-1668</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Ditz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkybytes.com/?p=5046#comment-1668</guid>
		<description>One of my blogging habits is to collate pro and con posts on a particular issue.

One reason to do is that each blog has its own set of commenters and often the comments reveal aspects of the issue previously not considered elsewhere.

Today&#039;s issue is the UK&#039;s General Medical Council&#039;s ruling on Andrew Wakefield.

I&#039;ve included this post in the list.

The list can be found at

&lt;a href=&quot;http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_speak_of_dreams/2010/01/andrew-wakefield-dishonesty-misleading-conduct-and-serious-professional-misconduct.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_speak_of_dreams/2010/01/andrew-wakefield-dishonesty-misleading-conduct-and-serious-professional-misconduct.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my blogging habits is to collate pro and con posts on a particular issue.</p>
<p>One reason to do is that each blog has its own set of commenters and often the comments reveal aspects of the issue previously not considered elsewhere.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s issue is the UK&#8217;s General Medical Council&#8217;s ruling on Andrew Wakefield.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve included this post in the list.</p>
<p>The list can be found at</p>
<p><a href="http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_speak_of_dreams/2010/01/andrew-wakefield-dishonesty-misleading-conduct-and-serious-professional-misconduct.html" rel="nofollow">http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_speak_of_dreams/2010/01/andrew-wakefield-dishonesty-misleading-conduct-and-serious-professional-misconduct.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; First Climategate</title>
		<link>http://snarkybytes.com/2010/01/29/anti-vaccination-movement-founder-dishonest-and-irresponsible/#comment-1667</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; First Climategate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkybytes.com/?p=5046#comment-1667</guid>
		<description>[...] now the scientific credibility of Jenny McCarthy is like that of Al Gore&#8217;s:  at the time he published his paper slamming vaccines and which started the antivax craze, he was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now the scientific credibility of Jenny McCarthy is like that of Al Gore&#8217;s:  at the time he published his paper slamming vaccines and which started the antivax craze, he was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

