Evidence? What evidence? I see no evidence here.

From Ed Morrissey on Hot Air:

Axelrod tells CNN’s John King that there is “no evidence” that the bribe attempt ever happened, even while he acknowledges that it would have been “a serious breach of the law.”

We’ve investigated ourselves and found nothing to see here. Move along.

Witness testimony does qualify as evidence, however, and Sestak has insisted on multiple occasions that the bribe attempt happened. Either Sestak is lying, or Sestak is telling the truth. If it’s the latter, then someone in the Obama administration committed a felony, and perhaps more than one, by Axelrod’s own admission. If it didn’t happen, then Joe Sestak is lying. In order to defend itself, the White House has been put in the position of having to call its party’s nominee for the US Senate a liar.

Oopsie. That’s gonna sting.

Remember, they’re professionals!

This entry was posted in politics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Evidence? What evidence? I see no evidence here.

  1. mike w. says:

    Yep, professional liars.

  2. Weer'd Beard says:

    “If it’s the latter, then someone in the Obama administration committed a felony, and perhaps more than one, by Axelrod’s own admission.”

    Wouldn’t be the first. Nor the last, because nobody is going to even bother with even the lowest hanging fruit when it comes to President Zero.

    Who Watches the Watchmen?

Comments are closed.