Newbius is over thinking this with his silencing-witnesses risk notion.
When a criminal attempts robbery, the very act jeopardizes you.
Shoot his ass. Repeatedly. If the robber doesn’t want to get shot for the attempt, he should try robbing with something that doesn’t project deadly force, like a feather duster.
Kristopher, thanks for the critique. I was only pointing out the obvious to the more obtuse among us.
Yes, the act of robbery in and of itself is reason enough to defend yourself. However, with 3 strikes laws, and other more draconian penalties for some crimes, the habitual, repeat-offender has little to lose by completing the deed and offing the victim.
Newbius is over thinking this with his silencing-witnesses risk notion.
When a criminal attempts robbery, the very act jeopardizes you.
Shoot his ass. Repeatedly. If the robber doesn’t want to get shot for the attempt, he should try robbing with something that doesn’t project deadly force, like a feather duster.
Kristopher, thanks for the critique. I was only pointing out the obvious to the more obtuse among us.
Yes, the act of robbery in and of itself is reason enough to defend yourself. However, with 3 strikes laws, and other more draconian penalties for some crimes, the habitual, repeat-offender has little to lose by completing the deed and offing the victim.
Alan, thanks for the link.