Is Police State. Is not Safe.

This entry was posted in Police State. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Is Police State. Is not Safe.

  1. Crotalus says:

    “Slow loss”, he says. SLOW loss?

  2. Chris C. says:

    And yet, I cannot get most of my colleagues at work, all professionals, to agree that there is even a danger of the establishment of a police state. One is a re-enactor on the Union side of the War Between the States, and idolizes Lincoln. Yet he know virtually nothing about the circumstances of the run-up to the war, the events during the war, or much history at all, other than the thin gruel served up in public middle schools. He has no curiosity about his “hobby” other than getting to dress up and play at being in a battle. One what he smugly described to me as “the winning side”. AArrggh!

  3. Old NFO says:

    I wouldn’t call it slow loss per se… If the LWL and others have their way, OUR way of life will be gone in our lifetimes.

  4. TJP says:

    I love the opening line. When exactly did mankind ever produce a peaceful, humble republic? I can’t think of a time…

  5. Kristopher says:

    It gets worse … The Pima county Sheriff is now trying to paint that Marine as a narco trafficer because he had a portrait of a saint in his house … one that purports to protect soldiers.

    Apparently narco “soldiers” also like this saint, therefore the Marine must be a narco.

Comments are closed.