But Metcalf is now challenging some of his more vocal critics with four questions. Here they are:
1. If you believe the 2nd Amendment should be subject to no regulation at all, do you therefore believe all laws prohibiting convicted violent repeat criminals from having guns are unconstitutional? Should all such laws be repealed?
YES. If it’s ok for them to be out of prison then it’s ok for them to have the means to defend themselves.
2. Do you also believe all laws establishing concealed-carry licenses are unconstitutional?
YES. I think any and all laws that restrict carrying arms in any fashion are unconstitutional.
3. Do you have a concealed-carry license anyway?
YES, I do. Because I’m not an idiot and don’t feel like going to jail for carrying a firearm for self defense.
4. Are you thereby violating the Constitution yourself?
This one proves yet again (like his misunderstanding of the word “regulation” in the 2nd Amendment) that Metcalf doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Citizens can’t violate the constitution, only government can.
Metcalf has proven repeatedly that he doesn’t understand the US Constitution or the business he used to be in.