<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SnarkyBytes&#187; Self Defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://snarkybytes.com/category/self-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://snarkybytes.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Gingrich Doctrine</title>
		<link>http://snarkybytes.com/2012/04/14/the-gingrich-doctrine/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkybytes.com/2012/04/14/the-gingrich-doctrine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 04:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkybytes.com/?p=11056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;&#8230;a treaty that extends the right to bear arms as a human right for every person on the planet.&#8221; Of course every person on the planet already HAS a right to bear arms. It&#8217;s just that most governments deny that &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://snarkybytes.com/2012/04/14/the-gingrich-doctrine/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/R07gcUhKKGc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230;a treaty that extends the right to bear arms as a human right for every person on the planet.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course every person on the planet already HAS a right to bear arms. It&#8217;s just that most governments deny that right. Newt should know better.</p>
<p>Also, how about we start here in the US? Some parts aren&#8217;t up to speed quite yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkybytes.com/2012/04/14/the-gingrich-doctrine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m not a sheep dog</title>
		<link>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/08/29/im-not-a-sheep-dog/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/08/29/im-not-a-sheep-dog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkybytes.com/?p=10637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sheep dogs are someone&#8217;s property and they help control other property. It sounds like a liberal&#8217;s fantasy of society. You know, the flock carefully tended and controlled with the sheep dog doing the master&#8217;s bidding. No thanks. I only plan &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://snarkybytes.com/2011/08/29/im-not-a-sheep-dog/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheep dogs are someone&#8217;s property and they help control other property.   It sounds like a liberal&#8217;s fantasy of society.  You know, the flock carefully tended and controlled with the sheep dog doing the master&#8217;s bidding.</p>
<p>No thanks. </p>
<p>I only plan on defending me and mine.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re on your own, sheep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/08/29/im-not-a-sheep-dog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QOTD: Weer&#8217;d Thoughts on Lethal Force</title>
		<link>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/07/11/qotd-weerd-thoughts-on-lethal-force/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/07/11/qotd-weerd-thoughts-on-lethal-force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkybytes.com/?p=10491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will not kill somebody over my property, but somebody willing to threaten me FOR my property is willing to kill me no matter what I do. I WILL kill over that. &#8211;Weerd Beard I like his thinking, but I &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://snarkybytes.com/2011/07/11/qotd-weerd-thoughts-on-lethal-force/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I will not kill somebody over my property, but somebody willing to threaten me FOR my property is willing to kill me no matter what I do. I WILL kill over that. &#8211;<a href="http://www.weerdworld.com/2011/lethal-force-over-stuff/">Weerd Beard</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I like his thinking, but I differ on one thing, and it&#8217;s a philosophical argument which winds up in the same place.</p>
<p>When someone steals my stuff, they&#8217;re stealing a piece of my life.  The piece that I spent working so that I could earn the money to buy that thing and the piece I&#8217;ll have to spend to replace it. </p>
<p>So yeah, I&#8217;ll shoot someone over my property.  </p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s MY life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/07/11/qotd-weerd-thoughts-on-lethal-force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indiana Supreme Court shreds Constitution</title>
		<link>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/05/13/indiana-supreme-court-shreds-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/05/13/indiana-supreme-court-shreds-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 14:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternate Universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkybytes.com/?p=9996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Indiana Supreme Court has decided that Indiana residents do not have a right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes. Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://snarkybytes.com/2011/05/13/indiana-supreme-court-shreds-constitution/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_ec169697-a19e-525f-a532-81b3df229697.html">The Indiana Supreme Court has decided that Indiana residents do not have a right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes.</p>
<p>In a 3-2 decision, Justice Steven David writing for the court said if a police officer wants to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, a homeowner cannot do anything to block the officer&#8217;s entry.</p>
<p>&#8220;We believe &#8230; a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence,&#8221; David said. &#8220;We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest.&#8221;</p>
<p>David said a person arrested following an unlawful entry by police still can be released on bail and has plenty of opportunities to protest the illegal entry through the court system.</p></blockquote>
<p>Spoken like a true lawyer.   Tar and feathers time.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h6>(via FarmDad in GBC)</h6>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/05/13/indiana-supreme-court-shreds-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Situational Awareness Win</title>
		<link>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/05/11/situational-awareness-win/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/05/11/situational-awareness-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 14:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkybytes.com/?p=9972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Creepy guy is creepy, stalkee refuses victim role. There are a some of great lessons here. It can happen to anyone, anywhere, so pay attention. When that little voice tells you something is off, pay attention. Don&#8217;t rely on someone &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://snarkybytes.com/2011/05/11/situational-awareness-win/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://falnfenix.blogspot.com/2011/05/self-defense-redux.html">Creepy guy is creepy, stalkee refuses victim role.</a></p>
<p>There are a some of great lessons here. </p>
<p>It can happen to anyone, anywhere, so pay attention.  When that little voice tells you something is off, pay attention.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t rely on someone saving you.   You&#8217;re on your own out there.  Someone MIGHT help or they might just decide not to get involved.  Any plan that relies on other people doing the right thing isn&#8217;t a good plan.  </p>
<p>Refuse to be the victim.  Criminals expect certain behavior from their victims.  Don&#8217;t comply, ever.</p>
<p>Fortunately Laura didn&#8217;t leave her most important weapon behind this morning and she&#8217;s not a police report.   </p>
<p>Good job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/05/11/situational-awareness-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-Gunners are gimp hating bigots</title>
		<link>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/05/05/anti-gunners-are-gimp-hating-bigots/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/05/05/anti-gunners-are-gimp-hating-bigots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 19:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkybytes.com/?p=9940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike W. on anti-gun gimp hate: If you only have one leg how the hell are you supposed to run away? If you&#8217;re wheelchair bound how are you supposed to duke it out with someone ablebodied? Anti-gunners don&#8217;t care. Read &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://snarkybytes.com/2011/05/05/anti-gunners-are-gimp-hating-bigots/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anothergunblog.blogspot.com/2011/05/another-blogger-has-written-post.html">Mike W. on anti-gun gimp hate:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>If you only have one leg how the hell are you supposed to run away?  If you&#8217;re wheelchair bound how are you supposed to duke it out with someone ablebodied?  Anti-gunners don&#8217;t care.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the whole thing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/05/05/anti-gunners-are-gimp-hating-bigots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question of the day</title>
		<link>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/02/07/question-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/02/07/question-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkybytes.com/?p=9011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Is your life worth your life?&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://newbius.blogspot.com/2011/02/protecting-life.html">&#8220;Is your life worth your life?&#8221; </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkybytes.com/2011/02/07/question-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shooting in defense of beer!</title>
		<link>http://snarkybytes.com/2010/09/05/shooting-in-defense-of-beer/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkybytes.com/2010/09/05/shooting-in-defense-of-beer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkybytes.com/?p=7564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sumdood steals a guys beer, guy shoots Sumdood. Cops say legally justified. If I couldn&#8217;t live in Texas, I guess Arizona would be almost as good.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sumdood steals a guys beer, guy shoots Sumdood.   </p>
<p><a href="http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/local/gilbert/article_ffef73aa-b6c3-11df-8c31-001cc4c03286.html">Cops say legally justified.</a></p>
<p>If I couldn&#8217;t live in Texas, I guess Arizona would be almost as good.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkybytes.com/2010/09/05/shooting-in-defense-of-beer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ireland:  Not as stupid as the UK.</title>
		<link>http://snarkybytes.com/2010/07/21/ireland-not-as-stupid-as-the-uk/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkybytes.com/2010/07/21/ireland-not-as-stupid-as-the-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkybytes.com/?p=7059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Irish gun owners can now shoot intruders Irish homeowners can now legally use guns to defend themselves if their homes are attacked under new legislation. The new home defense bill has moved the balance of rights back to the house &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://snarkybytes.com/2010/07/21/ireland-not-as-stupid-as-the-uk/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Irish-gun-owners-can-now-shoot-intruders--98813794.html">Irish gun owners can now shoot intruders </a></p>
<blockquote><p>Irish homeowners can now legally use guns to defend themselves if their homes are attacked under new legislation.</p>
<p>The new home defense bill has moved the balance of rights back to the house owner if his home is broken into &#8220;where it should always have been&#8221;, say top Irish police.</p>
<p>The police association of superintendents and inspectors, the AGSI, stated that “the current situation, which legally demands a house owner retreat from an intruder, was intolerable&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking they only did it because in the UK it&#8217;s illegal to defend yourself and they had to be different from the fecking British.</p>
<p>Whatever the reason, good for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkybytes.com/2010/07/21/ireland-not-as-stupid-as-the-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake FBI raid in Florida</title>
		<link>http://snarkybytes.com/2010/07/19/fake-fbi-raid-in-florida/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkybytes.com/2010/07/19/fake-fbi-raid-in-florida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkybytes.com/?p=7021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If these had been real FBI agents what would have happened to the homeowner defending himself? That&#8217;s a hell of a choice to have to make in the middle of the night. If they&#8217;re real cops, and you defend yourself &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://snarkybytes.com/2010/07/19/fake-fbi-raid-in-florida/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hxxaq-3pfaQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hxxaq-3pfaQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>If these had been real FBI agents what would have happened to the homeowner defending himself?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a hell of a choice to have to make in the middle of the night. If they&#8217;re real cops, and you defend yourself you will go to jail if you live.  If they&#8217;re not cops and you don&#8217;t defend yourself then you&#8217;ll probably be killed. </p>
<p>Of course if real cops didn&#8217;t do night raids then it wouldn&#8217;t be an issue, would it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkybytes.com/2010/07/19/fake-fbi-raid-in-florida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

