A medal for NOT killing the enemy.
And no, it’s not The Onion.
NATO commanders are weighing a new way to reduce civilian casualties in Afghanistan: recognizing soldiers for “courageous restraint” if they avoid using force that could endanger innocent lives.
The concept comes as the coalition continues to struggle with the problem of civilian casualties despite repeated warnings from the top NATO commander, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, that the war effort hinges on the ability to protect the population and win support away from the Taliban.Those who back the idea hope it will provide soldiers with another incentive to think twice before calling in an airstrike or firing at an approaching vehicle if civilians could be at risk.
Most military awards in the past have been given for things like soldiers taking out a machine gun nest or saving their buddies in a firefight, said Command Sgt. Maj. Michael Hall, the senior NATO enlisted man in Afghanistan.
“We are now considering how we look at awards differently,” he said.
British Maj. Gen. Nick Carter, the NATO commander of troops in southern Afghanistan, proposed the idea of awarding soldiers for “courageous restraint” during a visit by Hall to Kandahar Airfield in mid April. McChrystal is now reviewing the proposal to determine how it could be implemented, Hall said.
Unfortunately, ass hattery like this will get soldiers and Marines killed.
Does this remind anyone else of the medal presentation in Catch-22?
– I was awarded that particular medal for killing fish.
– You have killed many fish?
– Yes, I am one of the biggest… I am the most renowned killer of fish in the US Army Air Force.
Yes, the scene in Catch-22 is the first thing I thought of….
Now, will Obama want awards for whoever runs the fastest away from a firefight?
Pingback: SnarkyBytes » Word Origins: Bazooka