Hawaii Birth Certificate – 1963

There’s been some questions raised about what a birth certificate from Hawaii might look like.

Here’s mine from 1963, with some of the details redacted.


UPDATE:  This is a certified copy made in 1998. 

This entry was posted in politics, Teh Interwebz. Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to Hawaii Birth Certificate – 1963

  1. Ok, here is something I don’t understand. Obama was born in 1961. Hawaii became a state in 1959. Why would he show a certificate of birth abroad?? My son has one because he was born in Germany while I was stationed there. If Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961 than he should have a normal state birth certificate./

  2. alan says:

    All I know is there were a lot of people looking for an example of a certificate from Hawaii. I had one from around that time, so I posted it.

    The certificate from Daily Kos shows the city of birth as Honolulu. His bio on Wikipedia lists his birthplace as Honolulu, Hawaii, so I’m not sure where the abroad part comes in.

  3. Gary says:

    What is really needed is a birth certificate from Hawaii in the 60’s where one of the parents is African-American. Obama’s father is listed as “African”. Was this how A-A’s were referred to in 1961? It is argued on the net that he may actually be Arab.

  4. Elsa says:

    The reason people say Obama is Arab because his dad’s family was Arab so only 6.5% African passed from the dad to Obama and 43.5% Arab. Obama is not “legally” African according to federal rules.

  5. Jolene says:

    The fathers race was NOT AFRICAN, that was his NATIONALITY. The Mothers is listed correctly as caucasian meaning white AND NOT AS AMERICAN.
    However back in 1961 African Americans or black people’s race was always identified as
    Black and Afro American came after the Civil Right laws were passed.

    This man Obama thinks the American people are stupid, and tht they will believe anything he tells them, they have done so up to now, that is how he got were he is.

    Wake up before it is too late!

  6. Ray says:

    Jolene wrote:

    The fathers race was NOT AFRICAN, that was his NATIONALITY […]

    Obama Senior’s nationality was Kenyan.
    Africa is a continent – not a nation.

  7. sick of hypocrisy says:

    The reason people say Obama is Arab because his dad’s family was Arab

    That’s not true.

  8. sick of hypocrisy says:

    see, for example, some real research and not crap pulled of blogs run by anti-arab racists like pamela geller.


  9. Cat in NJ says:

    7./8. “sick of hypocrisy” … you are? And you still support the most outrageous hypocrite to enter US politics, Barack Obama? Wow.

  10. Ray says:

    Here’s the latest assessment of Obama’s certificate:

    If any of the Photoshop ‘allegators’ could do what their imagined forger was supposed to have done, they would have demonstrated it by now with NEW text but I know that it cannot be done without leaving tell-tale signs.

  11. Ray says:

    David, Chandler, AZ wrote:

    “Ok, here is something I don’t understand. Obama was born in 1961. Hawaii became a state in 1959. Why would he show a certificate of birth abroad?? My son has one because he was born in Germany while I was stationed there. If Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961 than he should have a normal state birth certificate.”

    Obama has a certificate for his birth in Hawaii in 1961 and a genuine copy of it is on several websites. The Health Department in Hawaii is not permitted by law to confirm any details of any birth unless special circumstances exist, but they have NO obligation under the law to reveal information about people who were NOT born in Hawaii. In this case they have said they need permission from Obama to release details of his birth – which means only one thing – they HAVE those details. If Obama had been born in Kenya or on Gilligan’s Island they wouldn’t have the details.

  12. Ray says:

    Should Obama be offended if it turns out his
    parents were not married, and people say he
    is “illegitimate” (an extinct legal term).

    I say no, because it wouldn’t be good politics
    to indicate that there was something for him to
    be ashamed of. If anything he will pick up MORE
    votes from people who may have something in
    common with him.

  13. Ray says:

    Elsa wrote:

    “The reason people say Obama is Arab because his dad’s family was Arab [….]”

    No, Obama’s ancestors on his father’s side in recent centuries are all from Kenyan tribes. It was HIS Kenyan people who in 1952 sent out drum messages all over Kenya and beyond, that King George VI had died in England. They spread the word a lot faster then the White people in Kenya did with their communications systems.

  14. smithy says:

    Wouldn’t it be embarrasing if BHO’s original birth certificate had him described not as “Negroid”, but as “Caucasian” or “Polynesian”?

  15. Ray says:

    smithy wrote:

    “Wouldn’t it be embarrasing if BHO’s original birth certificate had him described not as “Negroid”, but as “Caucasian” or “Polynesian”
    I doubt if it would bother Obama. I think it would be fair to say that because of his background – being brought up as White by a mother with extraordinarily tolerant values, AND living in a very multi-cultural society like Hawaii AND living in Indonsia AND learning about Islam to a small extent after being in a Catholic school until he moved house and found an Islamic school nearer, he would have a much greater understanding of all these tags than the rest of us. Obama is actually a White man with dark skin – who had to LEARN how to be Black.

  16. C'mec ci says:

    What are you hiding through the redaction? How can we trust anything you say or do when you’ve obfuscated so many fundamental facts about your own background?

  17. Ray says:

    Who are you talking to C’mec?

  18. Larry Bratsveen says:

    After reading a lot of the emails on Hawaii Birth Certificates and trying to understand why we can’t see the original BHO birth certificate of somebody wanting to become leader of the USA (The greatest and most powerful country ever), it seems to me that the position he is running for should be reason enough for Hawaii to release the documents to the American public with or without his permission.

  19. Rachel says:

    Guess what. My birth certificate from NY looks just like this one. The one that was forged by the blogger looked totally fake compared to what a real one looks like.

  20. G says:

    Alan, you may have hit on something pretty interesting. On Factcheck.org they state that Hawaii does not issue long forms and that is why Obama only has a short form…However, we clearly see here, that isnt the case. I would challenge factcheck.org with your proof that they do…Besides, with that comment made by factcheck, tells me that anyone born in Hawaii cannot get a passport, because in order to obtain that, you have to have the long form, no exceptions… here is the link on factcheck http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

  21. johnwx1 says:

    Fact check link seems to be pretty convincing that they have seen a real version.
    With that being said, was he adopted as Barry Soetoro, while living in Indonesia as a child or became an Indonesian citizen?

  22. Eric says:

    Your BC looks just like mine. I was born in the same hospital and lived in the same town as you, not in 1963 but in 1966. I believe mine is a certified copy from the early 1980s. I also have another copy from the early 90s which looks the same.


  23. Joe Lawson says:

    Didn’t believe this at first, but after doing some research and seeing various birth certificates from Hawaii including this one which is identical to the 1961 version, I am wondering why Obama’s site decided to forge his BC and put it on line. By the way, African or Africa is not a race and never was put on BCs – the term African American generally came into use in the 1980’s. I am not sure if that term is even used on BC’s today. Its not a race-

    Also the term Certification of Birth is not the term used its Certificate of Birth

  24. Joe Lawson says:

    Here is what I sent to factcheck.org

    To whom it may concern,

    Re: Obama’s birth certificate

    First of all its NOT his birth certificate or even a certified copy of his birth certificate. Its an official certification of Obama’s birth in Hawaii by the person in charge in Hawaii. Its printed on Laser paper which means its new, not from the 1960’s. It simply states that Obama was born in Hawaii according to whoever printed out the form. Its a certification, not a Certificate of Live Birth — totally different.

    That particular form is not even good as a form of ID if you don’t have a passport on a cruiseship or are going to Mexico. The reason is that you can actually request a state to correct your BC with a AFFIDAVIT AND CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION and they will type all the info in that you fill out on that form, without ever even looking at your Certificate of Live Birth. So what you have on record is the amended version, and unless you actually see the Certificate of Live Birth you would never know that there was a difference or even a certificate at all. The issuer of the short form, which you are displaying, is simply printing out whatever has been typed into the computer from the certificate of correction form.

    My son has worked in vital statistics at this is what he told me. So in order for there to be a true confirmation of Sen. Obama’s Citizen status, you will need an official copy of the Certificate of Live Birth.

    Joe Lawson

  25. read the print says:

    Has anyone noticed that the BHO certificate is in a computer font? Were birth Certificates really done by computer then? NO, typewriters have a very different font than the one produced.

    FYI-factcheck.org is a supporter of the obama campaign.

    Chew on that

  26. AXJ-KENYA says:

    The international civil rights organization AXJ has contacted AXJ-Kenyan and apparantly they have located a birth certificate from the hospital in Kenya.

    Stay tuned because they will publish it on:


    Available 24/7/365. AXJ

  27. AK Farmer says:

    Now the birth certificate on this website looks like an original birth certificate.

    Even though I was born in Alaska before it was a state, my original birth certificate is similar to the one posted on this site. It had the details of both parents and their birthplaces as well as their occupations and the name of the doctor who delivered me.

    The birth certificate from Hawaii they show online as belonging to Obama just isn’t convincing. If all birth certificates looked like the one they claim is his, due to the many people who share similar names, how is a person to say who’s birth certificate belongs to whom?

  28. GerriH says:

    Has anyone here ever lost his or her original Birth Certificate? My original looked like the original posted on this blog. It was lost in a move I made in 1988. I went down to the County Bureau of Birth and Death Recoeds to obtain a new copy. I had to bring a photocopy of the old one, my photo ID and Social Security Card to prove my identity before they would issue a replacement. Obama’s is a replacement. My current BC looks exaxtly like his. This stupid rumor need to stop.

  29. diana57 says:

    If you would like some updated news go to this link. . .

  30. diana57 says:

    You may also go to the African Press website and read that they have promised to release the audio tape of the phone call from Ms. Obama in its entirity and you can read the explanation as to why the media has not reported any of this to date.

    This will get very interesting but it still does not answer as to why Sen. Obama will not produce a photo copy of his “Certificate of Live Birth” known to be a totally different document than the rather pitiful posting of the Certification of Live Birth that any old person can get a blank copy of with enough money and the right contacts.

    The American public will not tolerate fraud. Not in votes, not in births and not in hidden racism. What comes out of your mouth is determined by what is in your heart. Caucasian Americans or plain old Americans have worked too hard and come too far also to allow discrimination, much less reverse discrimination, to be a major player behind the scenes in our government. Racism in any form is unacceptable.

  31. Pingback: Political Comedy / Jokes / Pics - Page 30 - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!

  32. Debbie31 says:

    I do not understand why you people here are speculating and trying to guess about BHO……just go to the sources of all that is happening: http://www.obamacrimes.com and http://www.americasright.com and you will get all fo the correct information.

  33. D Lyman says:

    I would like to see a raised seal on a certificate of live birth

  34. dAVE says:

    Hawaii vital records show 4 birth and 4 death certificates for barack Obama. The 4 birth certificates usually occur when there is an adoption – new parents are retroactively listed as birth parents. By why 4 death certificates – This is usally an indication of assumed identity, CIA?

  35. bobbi Anne says:

    Andy martin (http://contrariancommentary.blogspot.com) has just returned from
    an investigative mission to Honolulu and claims that barack Obama is really
    the son of Frank Marshall Davis.
    This seems to make more sense, because why whould Grandpa dunham bring
    his grandson to a known pervert?
    It would also explain how Obama made his infamous conection to
    Dr. Khalil al-Masoud who funded his Harvard education.
    Frank Marshall Davis wrote a pornographic book in which he
    describes how he and his wife Helen engaged in
    relations with a teenager Anne.
    also Frank marshal Davis wife was a chicago socialite, so
    that may explain how he made his connections so easily.

  36. Mobius says:

    For anyone who is interested, I have posted what a circa 1963 birth certificate looks like from Hawaii – a copy generated in the same time frame. MINE looks almost identical to it.

    Back then, they were BLACK with WHITE letters.


  37. Kate says:

    As for the difference between the certificate of live birth and the certification published by Obama, I visited the State of Hawaii website and looked up these documents and their purpose. If anyone does the same and their opinion or their findings differs from mine or my interpretation, your feedback is welcome. According to what I read, the certification Obama provided is what is issued for situations such as those when a mother gives birth abroad and returns with her child to Hawaii. She then registers the birth with the Hawaiian birth and this certification is issued. Also, if you google images, using both the certificate of live birth: Hawaii or certification of birth: Hawaii, you will see that the certificates for births in Hawaii during the early 1960’s appear to substantiate this information. Also, I do doubt you could cross back into the U.S. from Mexico with the document Obama is providing. I resided in Mexico for two years and often crossed the border into California. With the requirement of the I-9 Immigration form, Obama would not be able to use his “birth certificate” for employment in the U.S.

  38. jan says:

    I’ve not had a child so I never had to fill out the application for a birth certificate for a child, but i’ve done a little research. To get a birth certificate issued for a child, the parent(s) fill out an application. The parent certifies the accuracy of the information by signing a section which essentially states the information provided is accurate. (like the verification statement you sign when filling out your tax return which verifies the accuracy of the information).

    If a child is born in a hospital, a hospital staff person certifies the information in one section of the application and provides the staff person’s name and the hospital where birth occured.

    However, not all children are born in a hospital so this hospital certification is not required in order to issue the birth certificate.

    Therefore, it is possible that the canidate’s mother delivered her son in Kenya, possibly because most airlines won’t let you fly after a certain date in your pregnancy. After, his birth in Kenya, his mother and he arrive in Hawaii. She gets the application to apply for a birth certificate and to avoid “problems” — she’s about 18 remember, she just puts down that he was born in Honololu, Hawaii. And signs the document.

    She’s not a lawyer, probably can’t afford to consult with an immigration lawyer if she thought about it and she is likely not an expert on Immigration and Citizenship laws. All she wants is a birth certificate for her son and she’s a U.S. Citizen right? What’s the harm. None really until her son decides to enter politics and run for president of the United States which requires that all canidates be “natural born” citizens of the U.S. i.e. born in the U.S. or conferred that status under the Immigration and Citizenship laws at the time of birth. Naturalized citizen is one who applies for citizenship as an immigrant or if child born abroad and seeks to assert child’s right to dual citizenship (where parents of child are of different citizenships). The Constitution does not allow one who holds the status of “naturalized” citizen to qualify to run or act as president of our country.

    So, what is needed is either an original (Vault) birth certificate showing the hospital, or the application which shows the hospital staff person and hospital where he was born in Hawaii, or the actual hospital records.

    Otherwise, all we are relying upon is an eighteen year old girl’s assertion of where her son was born. Given the alleged statements by his paternal grandmother circulating around the web that the grandmother was at his birth in Kenya, the question is a legitimate one given the constitutional requirement that one be a born in U.S. to run and act as president of the U.S.

    If he was born in Kenya, then the Immigration/Citizenship statutes govern whether she can confer “natural born” citizenship status. According to the lawsuit filed by a former Deputy Attorney General for Penn., the applicable statute in 1961 stated that for a U.S. citizen to give this status to their child born abroad at least one parent must have resided in U.S. for 10 years before the child’s birth AND the parent had to reside in U.S. for 5 of those years after age 14. His mother was 18 when he was born, not 19, so she wasn’t eligible to confer “natural born” status to her son Barack if he was indeed born abroad.

    I am curious why his maternal grandparents haven’t spoken up to clarify the issue as one would think they would know where their daughter was while she was pregnant and where she was when she gave birth….unless they were not in contact with their 18 year old daughter during this time period.

    I also would not just assume everything is fine and this is all just speculation if I were you. It isn’t as if politicians haven’t misrepresented themselves before. In Clayton county Georgia last summer one of the elected school board members lied about his residence during his campaign and had to step down after his election to the Board when it was confirmed he didn’t even live in the district he ran in as required by law.

    If eventually it is confirmed Senator Obama was born in Kenya not Hawaii, then Joe Biden gets to be president.

    The sad part is Senator Obama may not know all of this if his mother never told him what she did.

    Any thoughts.

    Regardless it needs to be addressed. And yes the certificate on the website does not note the hospital and is a computer generated copy.

  39. Eileen says:

    Did anyone ask John McCain for a birth certificate

  40. Kevin J says:

    I guess there is a petition here that can be signed to try and avoid a constitutional crisis:

  41. The Borough of Brooklyn says:

    I once had to submit a vault copy of my b/c for some reason–it has somewhat different info on it than the one above. The 1963 version above is helpful, but has anyone in the McCain camp found a 1961 sample?

    And BTW–the very last line on the ’63 reads:
    “23. Evidence for delayed filing or alteration”

    Maybe BHO’s b/c has some important info there he doesn’t want made public. Remember, he’s a lawyer, well schooled in what to present and what not to present.

  42. Joe says:

    Jan’s post said it all. The same thing I’ve been saying. His mother strolled into the clerks office and her and the clerk filled out the birth registration. Remember, this was 1961 and no one was considering this baby might run for President someday.

    So, Obama is now on file, and later gets entered into the database probably in the 1980’s sometime.

    Then in 2007 Obama just gets a laser printer form copy of his “certificate of birth”.
    Originally all the info was supplied by his mother.

    Possibly he’s hoping to win the Presidency and then once he’s inaugurated to hide behind the Democratic Congress which would never impeach him under any circumstances.

    This all may not be true, but if it is and if he was born in Kenya, he’s pulling off the biggest coup in the history of the world.

    So, now the point is, who was the attending MD? Who was his pediatrician? Where are the records? Is Obama the “man from nowhere” or what?

    What’s his problem with complying with requests for further documentation? Instead he fights the requests with legal maneuvers. Very strange way to behave if you don’t have anything to hide.

  43. shawn says:

    what’s the point of this discussion? If his mother is a u.s. citizen, he is a u.s. citizen. Are you worried he’s concealing the mark of the beast printed on his birth certificate, or maybe they left of his other middle names, hitler satan ? The religious right can’t accept that the 50% of the country that chooses Obama is the highest achievers in education and occupation. It comes down to a choice, between two candidates. You don’t see Obama supporters clinging to every conspiracy theory about McCain…

  44. kate says:

    Shawn: My understanding is that had Obama’s mother reached the age of 19, her citizenship followed hers as a US citizen. She was 18 when giving birth and if in Kenya, the citizenship followed his father’s who is allegedly a Kenyan citizen. If she did give birth in Hawaii, he would have been born an American citizen. However, she moved to Indonesia, married an Indonesian citizen who adopted Obama, therefore, making him an Indonesian citizen. Dual citizenship was not recognized between the US and Indonesia at that time, and at present, should be hold dual citizenship, this would have been in conflict with the US Constitution with regard to his eligibility to run for POTS. I would attribute what is alleged to possibly a “conspiracy theory” if his own campaign had not claimed he was born in Kenya and the fact that he traveled to Pakistan at a time when Americans could not travel to Pakistan. What passport did he use/was he entitled to use if not an American and remain solely an American citizen?

    With regard to 50% of the citizenship chooses Obama, the fact remains that the average IQ in this country is only 100; the college “elite” are made up of students or adults with perhaps only a minimal amount of college attendance (do they have a B.A., M.A., an A.A. or a few credits?), many of who can’t seem to spell, and without the life experience in which thy have the chance to apply what they have learned in college.

    Note: I have six years of college and have been employed as a legal professional for 22 years

    Should Obama be found not to be a US citizen if (or after) elected as POTS, this would not only cause more embarrassment to this nation globally, but be a slap in the face to the Constitution that has afforded us the rights we enjoy as citizens such as the ability to post these arguments in a public place.

    How arrogant is our so-called “college elite” to believe their interpretation of the Consitution is more correct that the previous “college elite” such as Jefferson who drafted the Constitution?

  45. Brian says:

    I have seen a copy of his birth certificate on line, if this is a laser copy of his original birth certificate why does the lower left corner have a revision date of 11/01. And does not even come close to the one above which looks like my birth certificate which is from California 1963.

  46. Pegy says:

    Alan, my daughter was born in Hawaii in 1971 and when I requested a certified copy in the 1980’s, it was identical to yours. Also, it is identical to the one that I was given in 1971 when she was born. Why would they present something different for Obama? hmmmm

  47. Thomas says:

    I was looking at my birth certificate from Oklahoma 1965 and it looks very much like the one posted here. One thing missing clearly is the signatures of the parent and Doctor or who ever attended the birth and the signature of the registrar. That copy on his website doesn’t look like any birth certificate I have ever seen and I would not accept it as proof of birth in the United States. Even if he was born at home there must be names of witnesses and the person filing the certificate officially.

    I am a Obama supporter and already voted for him but this is really step one of the eligibility to be President of the United States. I would also, accept that if he was born overseas that he would be eligible as a U.S. citizen since his mother was one. This will be found out.

    I was stationed in Panama during 1989 to 1990 so I knew at the time McCain was born there that was U.S. territory same as being born in Washington, D.C.So that was never an issue. But then again I have not seen a copy of McCain’s Birth Certificate either.

  48. jan says:


    First, I have ALWAYS voted Democrat for the past twenty some odd years, assisted on Democratic campaigns and hold an advanced degree. I also studied political science in college with a minor in American history. I have followed constitutional law as a hobby although I do not practice in it.

    If you are going to claim to be “elite”, i.e. well-informed or better educated than everyone else, please do your legal research before blogging. Your assertion that just because his mother is a U.S. citizen then he is and therefore meets the eligibility requirement contained in the U.S. Constitution is overly simplified and not supported by the Constitution, or the applicable 1961 Federal statutes governing citizenship status confered upon children of U.S. citizens born abroad. And under the applicable law in 1961, together with his mother’s age when she gave birth, he is not conferred the status of a natural born citizen IF HE WAS BORN IN KENYA. Since that is the Constitutional requirement to take the office of President, it matters.

    In fact, Senator Obama should know how critical this issue is because he not only is a lawyer, but he taught constitutional law and claims to have a love of this area of the law.

    This factual discrepancy did not arise because a stranger stated he knew Senator Obama was born in Kenya not Hawaii. These are statements from HIS Kenyan grandmother whom he knows and has spent time. He’s written a book which is partially about his family in Kenya. By all accounts, his Kenyan grandmother speaks of his accomplishments and claims him as an important grandson and member of his Kenyan family. So she appears to be a credible witness – in fact, she is likely a biased witness in his favor. But she makes these statements publicly.

    Given his grandmother’s statements, a responsible canidate should do his utmost to provide the best evidence available to resolve the matter beyond any doubt. What he has provided is a computer generated short form which does not include the hospital information. The original long form would provide this information. The application for issuance of a Certificate of Hawaiian birth would be the best evidence because it is the original source of all the information filled out by his mother and the hospital staff.

    He should provide the best evidence to resolve a factual discrepancy from an apparent legitimate source – his grandmother. If for no other reason than to protect to validity of the Constitution and its eligibility requirements for all canidates which run for office governed by this document. If he double deals by not providing the best evidence to resolve the matter, then doesn’t that weaken the respect we hold for the Constitution? If we or he is willing to ignore the Constitution in this matter, then what else within that document is “unimportant” when it interfers with our opinion of what is right or our personal agendas.

    Consider this: If this factual discrepancy is resolved after the election and it is proven that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii, then he is not eligible to take the office of President even if he wins the election and is voted in by the Electoral College in December. He can not even take the Oath as it requires him affirm and swear to uphold the U.S. Constitution. If it is confirmed after he takes office, he arguably can not remain in office under the Constitution. There is no waiver for lack of timeliness in the Constitution. If this is proven, he can’t act as President. Now what will that do to this country that he loves so much.

    Again, I would not even be concerned about this other than the fact that his GM in Kenya appears to be a credible source and he has done nothing to explain her statements or why she is wrong. So we have a grandmother who says she was at his birth in Kenya and an abbreviated government document which lacks the name of the hospital in Hawaii. And a candidate who wants me to just ignore his grandmother’s recollection as an eyewitness and accept this document because he says I should.

    Also, the fact that the Kenyan government has sealed any records pertaining to Obama until after the election (which I’m trying to verify with a news report) raises the question, why are there records to seal if he wasn’t born there. And why is the Prime Minister of kenya having them sealed anyway. And why did the Prime Minister travel 275 miles across Kenya to visit the Grandmother who made these statements on Monday October 27th of this week? That was reported in a Nairobi newspaper.

    Why does Senator Obama not explain to those of us who are concerned about this factual discrepancy why he believes his Kenyan grandmother is mistaken or wrong about his birthplace. Why does he keep pushing a short form which has no hospital information on it when his own grandmother tells it different and when a more informative document exists?

    My father once said when you are in a postion of authority or power it is not enough to follow the law but you must also conduct yourself so that you give no appearance of not honoring the letter or the spirit of the law. You have to remain above reproach.

    For such an important issue with such a simple solution, I am surprised he hasn’t held himself to this standard as a leader and put the matter to rest with the best available evidence rather than words. He is by all accounts a very intelligent man. His bio and reputation is that he seeks to serve rather than just chase a dollar. However, that does not mean I have to accept his assurances at face value and rely upon his word. I’m surprised he expects me to do so.


    And to those who have said it is someone else’s responsibility to vet him, no it is his to show he is without a doubt eligible under our Constitution to hold this office.

  49. Joey says:

    You seem to be a very smart person. I agree with almost everything you have written. I think that the fact he hasn’t resolved this by providing a copy of the original document really magnifies that he is trying hide something. Seems to me that it should be a prerequisute for all candidates to prove that they are elligible to run for the Office of The President just like we have to provide Birth Certificates when our kids play sports.

  50. Panic Stations says:

    I tried to persuade the media to ask Obama, why he won’t disclose a certified copy of his original long vault version of his Certificate of Live Birth in Hawaii. Nothing. They know that if they ask him a question like that, then he will never give them an interview again.
    Obama has disqualified himself from consideration by the electorate, for President of the United States, by his cover-up of this information. Remember Tricky Dicky? See following blog.

  51. Tina says:

    ok I looked up something and it show a CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH in Hawaii.
    The problem is that it looks nothing like what you have shown in the above picture so I just wanted to know what a Honolulu birth certificate looks like

  52. Panic Stations says:

    Tina – have you looked at my links above? Can you post a link to the certificate that you have seen?

  53. Joey says:

    Do you really think that there is anyone out there that will question this until it gets resolved? Seems to me that we are swimming against the tide and are getting nowhere. I was very excited when I heard about this developement. I am now feeling disappointed because I don’t believe anything will be done. I will keep my hopes up.


  54. Panic Stations says:

    Joey – We’re Americans. We never give up.

  55. ALOHA says:

    I was born in Hawaii in 1961, three months after Obama. My certificate of live birth looks exactly like the one posted above, info changed of course.

  56. Jay says:

    Ok I would like to see an original birth certificate instead of a second generation reproduction copy using a laser printer and arial style font that has very little information on it. However I am sure you nor I will ever see it. This is a joke.

  57. Panic Stations says:

    Aloha – Thanks very much for posting. Progress at last. What was the exact date that your birth was registered and what was the serial number on your original ‘Certificate of Live Birth’? We should be able to deduce whether Obama’s alleged birth was registered before or after yours. Have you read my blog in Politico? If you click on the link above in my post timed at 12.07am on the 4th November 2008, you will find the right page. If you register in ‘Politico’ as Aloha, (click on ‘register in tool-bar at top of page, then click on ‘register’ on log-in page) and you leave your account open, then I will be able to send you a private message. If you just post a brief reply, such as ‘very interesting’, in my ‘Tricky Dicky’ etc blog , then I will know when you are registered.

  58. Gandolfo says:

    If Barack was certified to be born in Hawaii on 8-8-61 then why does this site http://www.wargs.com/political/obama.html show that he was really born on 8-4-61? One reason is it took 3 days for his mother to be able to travel to Hawaii to register him as an American even though he isn’t. This is fraud and his mother should be in prison for this, whatever age she is!!! But then again, maybe that darn International Date Line is to blame???

  59. Panic Stations says:

    Gandolfo – I haven’t seen anywhere that Obama was born on the 8th August 1961. Where have you seen that? The date of birth shown on the short relacement certificate is alleged to be 4th August 1961 – see my blog. As for Obama’s mother, she died at the Straub Clinic in Honolulu on the 7th November 1995. The family tree link that you have provided is useful, though.

  60. mrunpc says:


    Affidavit of Bishop Ron McRae,
    I, Bishop Ron McRae am over the age of eighteen (18) and not a party to the within action. If called to do so, I could and would competently testify under oath as follows:

    I am the Continental Bishop who oversees the Anabaptists Churches in North America. I am also the Presiding Elder on the African Presbytery, where we have numerous churches throughout Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and mission works to several other African nations. The African Presbytery is comprised of the national bishops of the various countries we minister in and support, along with our statewide bishops from New York and Pennsylvania.

    We actively visit and minister throughout these African countries, and do so extensively throughout all of Kenya these last three (3) years. in overseeing the establishment of our churches and presbytery to Kenya over the last two (2) years we have had personal dealings, continually, with many citizens of Kenya from every tribe and economic standing throughout the wonderful nation of Kenya, with whom the national interests in United States Senator Barack Hussein Obama is a very popular topic of discussion. The tribal cultures of the Kenyanese people have involved much turmoil during the national elections at the end of December 2007 and the beginning of 2008.

    The much published violence that erupted over the presidential elections caught the world’s attention. Myself and several American minister with our church were present during this time in Kenya, and the facts concerning this strife and the ensuing violence were well known, and of common knowledge throughout all of Kenya.

    The opposition party that was responsible for all of the violence was from the minority Luo tribe, which is a Muslim tribe that supported Mr. Raila Odinga for president. Raila Odinga is a Marxist socialist who graduated from the East Germany Magdeburg University in 1970 on a scholarship from the East German government. He named his first born son after Fidel Castro. Raila Odinga spent six years in prison for his admitted involvement in the bloody coup attempt in 1982 to over take and assissinate Daniel Arap Moi, Kenya’s President. Mr. Odinga has publicly admitted to being the leader of that coup in his 2006.

    Mr. Odinga is the cousin of United States Senator Barack Obama. Mr. Obama is from the same Muslim tribe, the Luo Tribe, as Mr. Odinga. Senator Obama visited Kenya in August of 2006 and campaigned extensively for his cousin, Mr. Odinga, which gave Odinga a tremendous boost. During Senator Obama’s campaign stops on behalf of his cousin Odinga, the Senator made numerous claims against the democratic government of Kenya and Kenya’s Presidcent Mwai Kibaki, claiming they were corrupt, stating often, that Kenya was “ready for change”, just as he has campaigned here in the United States during the Presidential election. It has been common knowledge throughout Kenya that Senator Obama sent his foreign policy advisor, Mr. Mark Lippert, to Kenya at least three times to advise Mr.Odinga on his campaign strategies. See Mark Hyman’s Washington Times article published October, 12, 2008, attached as Exhibit “I”. Moreover, everyone in Kenya is well aware that Senator Obama donated over one million American dollars ($1,000,000) to his cousin’s, Mr. Odinga’s campaign, which is documented in the Kenyan Political Party, for Mr. Odinga. Orange Democratic Movement (hereinafter “ODM”) along with extensive funds from other Muslim supporters including but not limited to the Muslim son of Muammar Gadhafi, the dictator of Libyan’s Muslim government. These issues are common knowledge throughout Kenya, and the information is publicly document across the internet.

    It is detailed in Odinga’s financial reports and strategies ODM Internal Memo documents, attached as Exhibit “2?, which are public records, that a significant portion of Senator Obama’s financial contributions (made through an organization identified as Friends of Senator Barack Obama) were used to help finance both the signed Muslim Memorandum of Understanding as well as the planned violence, murders and bloodshed that occurred in December of 2007. Within the ODM Internal Memo attached as Exhibit “2?, the funds donated by Mr. Obama through “Friends of Senator Barack Obama” were to be used for “Violence as a last result…to discourage voter participation in hostile areas..use ODM agents on the ground to engineer ethnic tensions in target areas…support Kapondi’s forces in Mt. Eglori”, and to do as during “Mid-December”. Unfortunately, the exact violence described in these reports was carried out and occurred at the beginning of the second week of December 2007.

    Additionally, it is common knowledge throughout both the Christian and Muslim communities in Kenya, that contrary to news media propaganda here in the United States, US Senator Barack Obama is a Muslim and not a Christian, and that he was born in Mombasa, Kenya and not in the State of Hawaii as falsely purported by the Obama campaign for presidency of the United States. Mr. Obama’s cousin ran his failed campaign for the Kenyan presidency in the identical fashion of Senator Obama’s American campaign strategy, and that being to join a nominal Christian Church in order to publicly profess to be a Christian, while maintaining their actual Muslim beliefs, in order to sway public opinion away from the actual fact of his strong Muslim beliefs, family and goals. It is a known fact that membership in the United Church of Christ in Chicago, where Barack Obama was a member, does not require muslims to renounce their Islamic faith in order to join the UCC church. Throughout Kenya it is and was well publicized in the media that a Memorandum of Understanding agrement, attached as Exhibit “3?, between Raila Odinga and Shiek Abdullahi Abdi, chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum, was signed by Odinga in August 29, 2007 in which Raila Odinga promised if elected to implement drastic changes including but not limited to the following:

    * Recognize “Islam as the only true religion”
    * “Islamic leaders would have an oversight rule to monitor activities of ALL other religions (emphasis in the original)
    * Installation of Shariah courts in every jurisdiction to implement Islamic law
    * Implement a ban on Christian preaching

    Because of the seriousness of all of the above, as a Christian and a citizen of the United States, this preacher could no longer sit idly by knowing these things and continue to minister in both Kenya and the United States. As the presiding bishop over the Continental Presbytery of Africa, I authorized representatives within our church to locate and interview Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama, the actual grandmother of US Senator Barack Obama. Ms. Sarah Obama lives in the Alego-Kogello, approximately 37 miles from Kisumu, where the Anabaptists have a congregation, and where this preacher has preached several times prior to the December elections in 2007, and prior to the planned violence from the Odinga supporters, which erupted.

    With Senator Obama being born in Kenya and not in the United States, he is not a “natural born” citizen and it prohibits him from being eligible to run for and/or serve as President of the United States. Since Senator Obama’s birth was reportedly in 1961, birth records may or may not be available, so I felt it very important to obtain the testimony of his grandmother as a first hand witness, since it is commonly known throughout Kenya, and especiallyaround the Kisamu area, that Sarah Obama was present when Barack Obama, Jr. was born in Kenya.

    Accordingly, on Thursday, October 16, 2008 Reverend Kweli Shuhudia (actual name temporarily withheld to protect his life), an evangelist with our ministries traveled to Kogello and located Ms. Sarah Obama at her home, see the attached email attached as Exhibit “4?. Mr. Shuhudu is a very intelligent and educated citizen of Africa, a former teacher and respected evangelist throughout Africa. Mr. Shuhudia acts as our official translator when we are in Africa, and is fluent in both Swahili and English. Mr. Shahudu met and interviewed Ms. Sarah Obama at length on October 16th during which interview, he called me on my mobile number, see my phone record attached as Exhibit “6?. Mr Shuhudia called me first on october 16th at 10:33 a.m. and advised that hwe was with Sarah Hussein Obama and that she wanted to speak with me, but the connection was lost. He called me right back at 10:35 a.m. and he informed me that there were several hundred people present, celebrating Obama’s success. I questioned him about the format of the phone call and conversation with Ms. Obama, and then informed him that I would call him right back, so it would not cost him international charges for the call. I called him back at 10:40 a.m. and public music and voices could be heard that were gathered around Kweli Shuhudia. I then spoke with him and requested that htey utilize the speaker phone so everyone could hear.

    The speaker phone with its open microphone was utilized with Mr. Shuhdia, Mr. Vatalis Alec Ogombe the Kogelo Community chairman assisting in the translation work and Ms. Sarh Hussein, along with several hundred people including policemen present and listenin in the open conversation between the four of us for approximately 15 minutes. Mr. VO is also the step grandson of Ms. Obama and the cousin of Barack Obama. A third unknown party can be heard periodically interjecting both Swahili and English words in the public discussion and conversation between the four of us. At times, the room noise from other peoples’ voices makes some of the swahili difficult to hear, and towards the end of the conversation several men’s voices are heard that are not identified. As I talked to and question Ms. Obama publicly over the open microphone of Mr. S’s speaker phone, they would translate what I said to her in Swahili publicly, and then they would translate her Swahili responses to me publicly in English. Ms. Obama can fluently speak Swahili in her native dialect, but cannot read or write. In the ensuing public conversation, I asked Ms. Obama specifically, “Were you present when your grandson Barack Obama was born in Kenya?” this was asked to her in translation twice, and both times she specifically replied, “Yes! Yes she was! She was present when Obama was born.” Though, some few younger relatives, including Mr. Ogombe, have obviously been versed to counter such facts with the common purported information from the American news media that Obama was born in Hawaii, Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama was very adamant that her grandson, Senator Barack Hussein Obama, was born in Kenya, and that she was present and witnessed his birth in Kenya, not the United States. When Mr. Ogombe attempted to counter Sarah Obama’ clear responses to the question, verifying the birth of Senator Barack Obama in Kenya, I asked Mr. Ogombe, how she could be present at Barack Obama’s birth if the Senator was born in Hawaii, but Ogombe would not answer the question, instead he repeatedly tried to insert that, “No, No, No, He was born in the United States!” But during the conversation, Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama never changed her reply that she was in deed present when Senator Barack Obama was born in Kenya. A transcript of this taped public interview is attached as Exhibit “6?. Mr. Shuhudia took photographs during the open conversations and interview with Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama, which photos will be forthcoming.

    Becase of the seriousness of the political situation and the impact of such on a United States Presidential election, and because of the factual reality of tremendous violence in kenya towards Christians, especially in the immediate area of Kisumu, where both Sarah Hussein Obama and Rev. Kweli Shuhudia live, it is requested that all reasonable and legal steps be taken to secure Rev. Kweli Shuhudia’s identity to the Federal Court alone, in order to protect his life and safety for being willing to provide this very important assistance in gathering this testimony and evidence to be used in any Federal litigation.

    The above related facts are true and verifiable to the best of my personal knowledge before God Almighty, whom I am and whom I serve.

    I declare under the penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States, that the foregoing is true and correct.

    by the grace of God alone,

    Ron McRae
    Residing Bishop
    Continental Presbytery of Africa
    Anabaptists Churches of N. America

  61. HC says:

    We all know that it’s a fake.
    So, what are we going to do?
    The media is not going to do anything.
    We the people must.

  62. Breaking News http://www.plainsradio.com/chat.html
    Ed Hale
    Hi Folks:
    I have some great news. As many of you that has been listen to our radio show the last few days are familiar with the law suit that is in front of the Supreme Court which Leo has brought. Leo called me today and told me that all 9 of the Justice will go into a conference on December 5th and decide what to do with this case. Leo tell me that this was a history making event. It has not happened in many decades. This is what they will decide: 1). to grant his motion, 2). to dismiss his motion or 3). hold a hearing on the motion. Leo feels that they will hold a hearing on the motion which will be to decide the case. Folk this is important because of 1 reason, there is 5 Republican Judges and 4 Democrat Judge on the court. Leo feels that they will find in his favor.
    Leo tell me it was because of all the faxes and phone calls to Justice Thomas is why they are hearing this case. One of our member, PUMA_IN_MI was able to obtain Justice Thomas fax number and 1000’s of you send out faxes to him.
    Leo will be on Honest American News with Bob Vernon tonight at 8 pm to give the update. You need to be listening . Please join us in the Chat Room. We need everyone we can get into that chat room so that Leo will know that we are behind him.
    Please come to the chat room and join us tonight at 8:00 pm central time, CLICK HERE for the chat room
    Folks, do you realize what this means? Those Justice are about to overturn the election. One other thing, Leo had concern for his life and now thanks to one of our members, the FBI is watching him like a hawk. This thing is much bigger than me, and I am so proud of each and everyone of you who stood up with me and continued the fight. God Bless all of you.

  63. Panic Stations says:

    Can we have the AUDACITY to HOPE for JUSTICE and a decision to CHANGE the outcome of this fraudulent election?

  64. jennifer solis says:

    The birth certificate above is dated 1963; the certified copy, 1998; obviously, it doesn’t resemble what Obama has presented.

    A suggestion – request another copy, now, (2008) of the 1963 birth certificate, and see if it matches Obama’s recent copy.

    I’m guessing it won’t.

    Another point in question: why has Obama refused to release ANY medical records? Kids go to the dentist (hopefully) – immunization shots – doctor’s appointments – school records starting age 5. I know the mother was somewhat a “hippie”, but NOTHING?

  65. The BaldViking says:

    Good point, Jennifer. I would like to see what a 1961 COLB would look like if someone were to request one right now.

    I think you are right, that it wouldn’t match Obama’s copy. That would shut a few people up, wouldn’t it? Probably not, as they would find a way to spin their way out of it.

  66. Dominique says:

    Joe Lawson – I just wanted to point out that in England (my daughter was born there) and in France (I was born there) the correct term on our certificates is ‘Certification of Birth” not “Certificate of Birth” so you may very well be wrong when you correct it to say “Certificate of Birth.”

  67. Dominique says:

    Joe Lawson – I just wanted to point out that in England (my daughter was born there) and in France (I was born there) the correct term on our certificates is ‘Certification of Birth” not “Certificate of Birth” so you may very well be wrong when you wrote that the correct way was to say “Certificate of Birth.”

  68. Panic Stations says:

    Dominique – Look at the ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ at the top of this post. The heading is unambiguous at the top of the green certificate.

  69. Dominique says:

    Panic –

    I agree with you comment. What I meant to say was that some certificates do say “Certification of Birth” and that not all Live birth certs are stated the same. My apologies for not clearly stating that.

  70. Pingback: • Proof Obama was BORN IN KENYA-See his fake birth certificate for yourself here… « ASK THE ANIMALS and they will TEACH you… [Job 12:7-12] moniQuemonicat.wordpress.com

  71. Pingback: Obama citizenship crisis - Page 17 - Trackpads Community

  72. Pingback: Obama Birth Certificate and Other Conspiracies - The Moscow Expat Forums

  73. Matty Boy says:

    Um.. that IS NOT a Hawaiian Birth Certificate. That’s the certificate issued by the military hospital you were born at.

    Obama, not being born in a military hospital, would NOT have ANYTHING that resembles that document.

    Note box 20, where it states this was passed on local agencies
    Note where Hawaiian certificates have “certificate numbers” (as on Obama’s) – where as yours has “file number”.

  74. alan says:

    Matty Boy says: “that IS NOT a Hawaiian Birth Certificate. That’s the certificate issued by the military hospital you were born at.”

    So when I wrote Hawaii and asked for a copy of my birth certificate, you’re saying they sent me the wrong form?

    The “State Of Hawaii” and “Department Of Health” at the top are illusions?

    Military hospitals in your universe don’t file normal birth certificates with the state they’re in, just like every other hospital?

    Obama may not want to show anyone his birth certificate, but I assure you this one is real.

  75. Justin Case says:

    We shouln’t even have to discuss this. Obama should just show the American people a copy of the vault copy of his birth certificate that he had sealed. Period.

  76. Derrick says:

    Its real simple, Obama has only shown a Certification, and a forged one at that. It has been officially examined by forensic experts using a hex editor and has definitely been altered.
    The official, as Matt has posted, is a Certificate. From about 1910 to 1972 you could get a Certification even if you were born somewhere else. That was discontinued in 1972. However, birth certificates can be amended according to current Hawaiian code, even for foreign born, which is probably what Obama is in the process of doing.
    Bottom Line: Obama’s Certificate means nothing. You cannot even enroll a kid in little league baseball with a Certificate.
    So Obama has not been officially vetted and his citizenship remains in questions until he produces an official certificate (or at least a good forgery).

  77. Lucie says:

    My mother has my original birth certificate somewhere. When I need one to travel abroad I had to get a replacement. The original one from Kentucky has much more information on it. The copy I received in 2006 has no more info on it than Obama’s. I called the KY bureau that issued it because I was concerned. A lady there said that info on the original was no longer required on copies because they could be considered inappropriate these days and were not necessary for legal purposes. On the original my mother’s race was listed as “Mexican” , my weight, length, absence of birthmarks, birth order (single) and a few other things. The present one says Latin American. I don’t know if they do that in Hawaii or not but they do in a few other states also. I am glad of it.

  78. Ask Hawaii says:

    Ordering one in 1998 has no bearing on 2008. Order a fresh copy as was suggested months ago and see what you get. Same type of COLB as Obama. That’s all HI DOH sends since the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004. That type of short form is all some states send. It is the default choice many others send though they offer a long form. Either way both are legally just as valid and indicate county and state of birth.

    Some will say “From about 1910 to 1972 you could get a Certification even if you were born somewhere else. That was discontinued in 1972.” However you had to be over 1 year old to get that after submitting an affidavit. Not 4 days old as Obama was registered. Also it still would indicate true place of birth, i.e. Kenya not Honolulu.

  79. Just let you now says:

    Hay, Just to let you know even if he (Obama) was born in “The US” he is not a citizen since his mother was not here for the set time limit “10 years” she went to Africa to get F#@ked by a “African”. So He can not be American or should I say “A citizen of the United States” also the one picture of his “live birth” is not a real Birth Certificate. It is what you get after the birth certificate!! Just to let you know.

    First you are born. Your parents are then given a paper to sign “Birth Certificate” then they wait a few days. (This is because of the Old Days when lots of new borns died) Then your parents are sent another paper saying “Cerficate of live birth”…

    The picture posted here is the “Birth Certificate” not what obama has shown us which is the “Certificate of Life Birth” (Meaning He stayed alive after birth and did not die)!!!


  80. Jenn says:

    Sorry me and my fiance’s birth certificate looks exactly like Obama’s. We both are obviously born in Hawaii, (Kaiser baby) LOL

  81. Jenn says:

    I don’t know why yours looks different then ours, other then probably because it’s military. Both me and my fiance were born in Kaiser Medical Center, and it looks exactly like Obama’s. I’m only willing to show creditable press, but press don’t even want to touch this story because they think it’s conspiracy theorist nuts. I would be willing to show any creditable journalist from Fox News. By the way our Governor Linda Lingle who also said Obama’s birth certificate is legit is a Republican. If she had dirt on Obama, trust me Linda Lingle would of voiced it.

  82. Kal says:

    Show it or shut the fuck up. How’s that internship at Obamarama headquarters working out for you?

  83. Pingback: Obama's Birth Certificate - Page 64 - Interfaith forums

  84. Fred Dawes says:

    We all know about this pig Obama so what can you do when your government is in the hands of our enemies?
    If people cannot or will not act it means that people just don’t care. I for one do care but only 30 percent understand what this means.

  85. Pingback: The Absurd Report » News from Obamaland

  86. Shell says:

    So many of the reports that I have read indicate that Obama had his attorney fight to dismiss the charges against him. They also show that the judge that allowed this to be done was a left wing liberal, GO figure. It’s amazing how Obama can simply ignore these allegations and nothing more is coming of it. Why can’t a judge force him to submit something legal and binding. In other documented reports, his own grandmother states that he wasn’t born in the United States. Oh & does anyone know what ever happened to his illegal alien aunt? Not really. That has been dusted under the rug now too. I guess Obama figures if I ignores it, they will forget about it. Has anyone thougth about this, what if Obama is proven not to be a natural born citizen, his term as President is then revoked, what will happen to all the laws he’s changed? Will all that he has done simply go away? He’s already attempting to appoint all the liberal judges he can to the appellate courts & we all know what that will mean for our country…

  87. L says:

    I have found online at reputable news web sites a supposed copy of Obama’s birth certificate from Hawaii. On another web site, I found the same 1963 copy of a Hawaiian birth certificate as is found on this web site.

    The first is supposedly Obama’s “original” birth certificate…posted at http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jun/27/obamas-birth-certificate-part-ii/. It’s in the very similar, modern day digital format as my real estate license issued in 2006 through 2009. I’m trying to make out the date at the bottom left of when the last time the form was revised…looks like either 11/01 or 11/05. Immediately following the revision date is the word, “LASER.” If this is referring to a laser printer, they didn’t have laser printers in 1961. MORE IMPORTANTLY, A BIRTH CERTIFICATE FROM 1961 WOULD NOT HAVE A FORM REVISION DATE DATED AFTER 1961, MUCH LESS AFTER 2001 or 2005 AS INDICATED ON THE BOTTOM LEFT CORNER OF THE SUPPOSED [COMPUTER GENERATED] BIRTH CERTIFICATE POSTED AT politifact.com!!!!!

    The second attachment is of an actual 1963 birth certificate from Hawaii. He was born in 1961, which comes before 1963, so a birth certificate from 1961 should look the same as 1963 or very similar to it. My own 1961 birth certificate looks more like the 1963 Hawaiian birth certificate. Get your own birth certificates out and look at them. These forms were filled in either by hand or by typewriter as computers were not in use at that time.

    The first attachment of his “birth certificate” can not be accurate. There have probably been several form revisions since 1961 so how can his original birth certificate from 1961 look like one that was last revised in 11/01 or 11/05???!!!

    I would be interested in seeing another current Hawaiian birth certificate to see if the same verbiage at the bottom middle of the document is on all certificates… “This copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding.”

    Sheep will follow anyone who looks like a leader without questioning where they’re being led to or what danger they’re being led into…they simply follow. Sheep got him elected…the sheep will suffer along with everyone else.

  88. chai says:

    As stated on many Blogs, White people are “Pathetic” Good damn Grief, get over it you Racist freaks! Obama is president. Maybe you racist people can learn something about what it means to be a decent human being.

  89. Another Theory says:

    What if Hawaii didn’t even give birth certificates in 1961? They had only been in the union for two years. Before they entered the union, why would they even create a birth certificate for their citizens. It’s not like they would be receiving social security benefits. During the timeframe of 1959-1963 or so they could have still been in the process of documenting births and they just don’t have a good, solid record on it either way. Therefore, there’s no way to prove or disprove anyone on the issue. Both sides lose or win the argument. You folks do realize that while you’re spinning your wheels on this issue the rest of the country has moved on and national healthcare is up for debate. Remember, you can’t play the game if you aren’t even in the field. You can’t win the game unless your eye is on the ball. THIS ISSUE IS NOT THE BALL! At it’s best achievement if proven Obama is not eligible, the birth certificate issue would not accomplish a thing other than raise Joe Biden to the Presidency. Aren’t you goopers willing to let this go for the simple fear of THAT?

  90. ateepay says:

    I can’t believe after all this time no one has shown an actual birth certificate or live birth or anything from the same place in Hawaii. With all the people on the internet……????

  91. scooty says:

    Quoting Chai,
    Let’s assume for a minute that you have half of a brain. If you did, you would agree with me that people are judged upon the content of their character, not the color of their skin.
    Playing the race card does not work when you have a black president. You have stumbled upon a blog because you have nothing better to do than to avoid the actual debate only to admit that since you don’t agree with the comments that everyone is white.
    Who again is the racist?
    Please reconsider and judge this guy on his character, rather than merely the color of his skin.

  92. I found your site while looking for stuff to do while in Hawaii. Cool stuff, glad I stumbled across you.

  93. MoniQue says:

    In regards to Chai above from June 6, 2009 comment:

    I am not surprised Chai would bring up race. After all, it really IS the only thing Obama ran on now isn’t it? So we cannot be surprised that’s the main thing his supporters talk about. Skin color.

    Folks who are very obsessed with skin color, which really borders on a skin color FETISH, ought to know that not everybody is white who is commenting against Obama on the blogs. And you ought to know (or learn) that outward appearance means NOTHING to God. What does lying have to do with someone’s race or skin color? NOTHING!

    One race = human
    One nationality = American

    Ask the animals and they will teach you: they see all us humans as just that: humans…

    and it’s high time you did too.

  94. MoniQue says:

    P.S., “lying” as mentioned above in my post, specifically refers to the lying that Obama did and is still doing in regards to him not being a natural born U.S. citizen and thus not qualified to be president.

    P.S.P.S. And just for the record Chai, Obama is NOT the president. He is acting president and everything he is doing, every bill he signs is ILLEGAL because of it. And by the way, did you know Obama could care less about you? Perhaps even despise you? Yet, you defend this man like he is your friend and brother. My advice is to stay away from con men cuz you’re a perfect lop and patsy for one, if you believe Obama, you’ll believe anything.

  95. MoniQue says:

    Here’s the direct link to Obama’s perjurious sworn statement where he swears he was a natural born citizen:


  96. mike says:

    excuse me chai… as stated above ….white people are pathetic …fuc* you chink …if obama had a real fuc*kin bitrh certificate , then it would be no problem to show it but he doesnt since he was born i kanya even his grandmother said she watched him be born there why would she lie? It has nothing to do with race and im sick of hearing every time something is going on with obama that it was the white racist who said it, go fuc* yourself

  97. mike says:

    pardon my racist remark it was uncalled for but im just sick of hearing how everytime there is a problem with obama its the white racist who made it …grow the fuc* up

  98. mike says:

    and thats kenya* above mumbasso or something like that

  99. Jay says:

    The Sarah Obama Myth


    No, Obama’s grandmother didn’t say he was born in Kenya

    “OGOMBE: Hawaii. Hawaii. Sir, she says he was born in Hawaii. In the state of Hawaii, where his father was also learning, there. The state of Hawaii.”


  100. geri says:

    For you dizzy people who are still hung up on Obama’s birth certificate I have 3 birth certificates sitting in front of me. One is my mothers who was born in 1926 and the certificate says Certificate of Birth, Territory of Hawaii, Bureau of Vital Statistics, Honolulu, TH (“TH”-territory of Hawaii). Then it has an ID number and all the appropriate information, physicians name and address, a territory of Hawaii seal and signed and dated by the Registrar-General.

    The 2nd certificate is mine but the original which I lost was the same as my mothers. I was born in the 1940’s. When I went to have a birth certificate made in the 60’s after statehood they would not issue me the original territory of hawaii one so I have one like Obama which lists the minimal am’t of information and it says Certificate of Live Birth, State of Hawaii, Dept of Health, Hawaii USA. No registrar signed this but it states the date filed by registrar. The KEY NOTE on this certificate is on the bottom of the certificate where it states “this copy serves as PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE of the fact of birth”, in other words this is a legal birth document if needed for proof of birth or in court proceedings. I think this is where everyone gets confused but I can guarantee that no one can buy a Hawaii birth certificate if they weren’t born here. My 4 children born in the 60’s and 70’s also have one like Obama and they are all US citizens.

    The 3rd certificate that I have is of my grandchild born in the 90’s and it says Certificate of Live Birth, State of Hawaii, Dept of Health, Office of Health Status Monitoring, it also has a file# and an ID# with lots of information including mother & father, MD, registrar, hospital, race, address and it looks similar to alan above who posted his birth certificate in june 2008. someone mentioned that alan’s bc is a military bc and not a hawaii bc and that’s not true. Even when born in Tripler military hospital the bc given the patient is the same one given the residents of Hawaii. The only time there is a “military birth certificate” is when a baby is born in a foreign country and is a US citizen. Why this bc looks different then mine, and my chidrens is beyond me. Like everything else that changes, legal documents also change.

  101. independentview1 says:

    That would be nice IF Obama had a Certificate of Live Birth as you do. Obama says he has a Certification of Live Birth. One ends in a “e” one with an “ion”. They are VERY different documents. The state of Hawaii web sight says directly it does not accept Certification of Live Birth as proof of place of birth. Many people born overseas to Hawaii residents have Certificates of Live Birth, that is the point. A Certification of Live Birth simply says a woman who has a mailing address in Hawaii for at least a year gave birth and the child is alive. It is not proof of where the child was born. If Obama had been born in Hawaii he would have Certificate, with an “e”, of Live Birth. Nobody that I know of has ever shown proof of such a document existing.

  102. Tamra says:

    To independentview1,

    Would you please post the link to the State of Hawaii website that says they do not accept Certification of Live Birth as proof of place of birth?

  103. Tamra says:

    I found this on Wiki Answers:

    Q. Is a certification of live birth the same thing as a birth certificate in Hawaii?

    A. Answer: No, but the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands accepts both Certificates of Live Birth (original birth certificate) and Certifications of Live Birth because they are official government records documenting an individual’s birth.
    There are two categories of documents used in determining eligibility [for Hawaiian Home Lands program]: primary and secondary. Primary Documents Birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth and Certifications of Live Birth) and Certificates of Hawaiian Birth are the primary documents used to determine native Hawaiian qualification. The Department of Hawaiian Home Lands accepts both Certificates of Live Birth (original birth certificate) and Certifications of Live Birth because they are official government records documenting an individual’s birth. The Certificate of Live Birth generally has more information which is useful for genealogical purposes as compared to the Certification of Live Birth which is a computer-generated printout that provides specific details of a person’s birth. Although original birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth) are preferred for their greater detail, the State Department of Health (DOH) no longer issues Certificates of Live Birth. When a request is made for a copy of a birth certificate, the DOH issues a Certification of Live Birth. http://hawaii.gov/dhhl/applicants/appforms/applyhhl

  104. geri says:

    independentview1, I made a mistake.

    My most recent Hawaii birth certificate that was made says Certification of Live Birth. It was the most recent copy of my birth that my daughter applied for, for geneological purposes. It was printed in 2004. Whether it says Certification or Certificate of Birth it is the same and both can be used for legal purposes. My granddaughters original certificate which states Certificate of Live Birth was printed in 1994 when she was born. This is a more detailed certificate similar to alans above. Whyever do they have different looking certificates made by the State of Hawaii Dept of Health is beyond me. The “Certification” of Live Birth states that the copy serves as “prima facie” evidence of the fact of birth and that is the important thing. The state of Hawaii seal is on both types and that’s the important factor along with the certificate and file number. I hope this clarifies your questioning.
    Tamra, I can almost guarantee that there is no link available that declares that a Certification of Birth is not a legal birth document. I can guarantee that it is legal. I used my Certification of Birth certificate for court when I adopted my granddaughter. The Hawaiian home lands requirements for proof of birth is as genuine as can be. Those people play no games and if they say certification and certificate is accepted thats because both are legal and they no longer issue the old type, “certificate”.
    C’mon independentview1, FYI my “certification” does say where I was born, city, island and country (we weren’t USA yet when I was born) and it says nothing of a woman living in Hawaii for 1 year and gave birth etc bull shit…where in hell did you get your info from……let it go…

  105. Kathy says:


    I too would like to get to the bottom of this BC issue, especially since Hawaii will not even disclose their rules. They refuse to explain the Filed vs Accepted terminology. I would love to see a copy of your BC, confidential information redacted of course. If yours really does say date filed by registrar, maybe it’s because you were born before Hawaii was a state. Would you please contact the DOH to find out what it means on your BC that it says filed by registrar, instead of accepted by registrar? They may respond to you, because you have a vested interest in your BC. However, I’ve seen others born before Hawaii was a state which state accepted by registrar. Thank you in advance. I think you may be able to finally get to the bottom of this once and for all, for all of us. Thank you, God Bless and Happy Thanksgiving.

  106. Nellie says:

    Alan, my name is Nellie. I post at FR and at my own blog as Butterdezillion. I believe the Hawaii DOH is committing crimes to cover for Obama’s documentation. You can see some of my research at my blog at

    I recently posted an e-mail from the Hawaii DOH confirming that birth certificate numbers are assigned at the state DOH office. Somebody was trying to refute that by saying somebody who spoke to the vital stats worker said the hospitals had blocks of cert #’s and the hospital numbered their certs within that block.

    I don’t know if the formatting will work here, but I’m compiling a list of anonymous data regarding cert#’s (to the nearest hundred to maintain privacy) and hospitals. So far, Kapiolani has cert#’s that range from the 900’s to the 15,000’s:

    Date Cert # Hospital
    Jan, 1978 9xx Kapiolani
    June 1962 8,4xx Wahiawa
    Aug 1969 9,3xx Kaiser (Queens)
    Aug 1961 10,6xx Kapiolani
    Sept 1968 10,1xx Army Tripler
    Dec 1971 15,3xx Kapiolani
    Dec 1988 18,6xx Army Tripler

    If the block of numbers for Kapiolani remained the same throughout the years, I’d already have 3 different hospitals who gave out BC’s with numbers that should have only been used by Kapiolani.

    But the person trying to refute the DOH e-mail I posted says they’ve changed their process 4 times in the last 30 years. He could say that the block of numbers changed in that time. So the more numbers I’ve got to establish patterns with, the better off I’ll be in understanding and documenting how it really was.

    So – after all that (lol) – I am wondering if you would be willing to fill in your data for the chart I’ve got. Basically the cert number with the last 2 digits redacted. Or however much you wanted to redact. Or you can tell me to take a hike. lol.

    You could e-mail me, post here, or if you’re a Freeper you could private mail me there – if you’re comfortable with it. The only information I’m interested in is what would go in this chart.

    Thanks for considering it. I don’t know if you’ve got this thing on moderation mode or not, but you’re the only one I care about seeing this. If it posts publicly that’s fine too.

  107. Russell says:

    Trees without roots fall over

  108. Fourgeogy says:

    so what do you think?

  109. A pen says:

    Hawaii can prepare birth registration docs however it likes but it is a state not the constitution it agreed to follow when it was accepted as a state. Bottom line is that if Hawaii wants to certify Obama as a “natural born citizen” it must provide compelling evidence to meet that condition or none of its’ citizens are being served by the state properly and constitutional observance becomes an issue. Now, understand the meaning of “natural born citizen” and you can understand why the evidence presented will enter a court of law and be used to prove Obama fraudulently took the oath. http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-maybe-citizen-of-united-states.html

  110. people need to read the laws before talking out their a** says:

    as we all know
    Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution sets the principal qualifications one must meet to be eligible to the office of president. A president must:

    be a natural born citizen of the United States;[7]
    be at least thirty-five years old;
    have been a permanent resident in the United States for at least fourteen years.

    the question is “who is a natural born citizen?”


    Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?

    The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps. The Constitution authorizes the Congress to do create clarifying legislation in Section 5 of the 14th Amendment; the Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, also allows the Congress to create law regarding naturalization, which includes citizenship.

    Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”

    Anyone born inside the United States

    Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe

    Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.

    Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national

    Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year

    Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21

    Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years

    A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.

    as such anyone who still thinks obama is not a NBC is just talking out their a** and needs to look up these funny things called FACTS!!

  111. GET_OVER_IT! says:

    I have a question for all of the haters. I would like to know how you can possibly try to make this ridiculous argument about Mr. President’s citizenship? Anyone born in the US is a natural born citizen, they do not have to have 2 parents who are US citizens UNLESS they are born outside of the US. That is according to the 14th Amendment… Get over it already.

    The other thing I have to say about it is this: If the only way (natural born citizenship) to be qualified for the office of the President of the United States, according to your interpretation, is to have 2 parents who are BOTH US citizens, then how could George Washington have been president? John Adams? Thomas Jefferson? Shall I go on? NONE of these men could have possibly been born in the US or had 2 parents who were US citizens.

    I think that about sums it all up, so please come up with some different material to use in your UNPATRIOTIC bashing of our President!

  112. William says:

    Get Over IT!

    Article 2 of the Constitution states “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President”. George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson and the rest were covered because they were citizens at the time the Constitution was adopted.

    What Obama released looks nothing like any of the birth certs I’ve seen. I’d still like to see the one signed by the attending physician similar to the one John McCain had to produce during that election.

  113. CDR Kerchner says:

    My attorney, Mario Apuzzo, wrote an excellent report detailing why Americans have a right to be concerned as to whether Obama was physically born in Hawaii or just had his birth fraudulently registered as occurring there in 1961 simply to illegally get their new born grandson U.S. Citizenship, a highly coveted status now and then. Here is the link:


    CDR Kerchner

  114. CDR Kerchner says:

    Another point, Obama’s birth registration was FILED in 1961 but it was never finally ACCEPTED by the Registrar’s office. The FILING triggered the birth announcements in the newspapers which were placed there as a public service each week by the Health Bureau Statistics division. But apparently there was additional documentation information needed to prove the birth actually occurred in Hawaii to finalize the registration. Thus Obama’s CERTIFICATION of Live Birth he has posted on the internet says it was only FILED but does not show it as being finally ACCEPTED. See this page for examples of three CERTIFICATION forms. Look at the lower left corner for the difference.

    Obama Birth Registration Filed in 1961 But not ultimately Accepted

    CDR Kerchner

  115. fishhead says:

    On Obama’s COLB the line under LOCATION reads, HONOLULU. If this was not the case and in fact he was born in Kenya then that line would read KENYA. The newspapers from 1961 report his mother giving birth in HAWAII. Go get a HAWAIIAN newspaper from 1961 and read it or just google it and read yourself…

    Also why not check medical records from Ann Dunham (his mother) to see where she had her son…

    the birthers are just gullible suckers.

  116. WITH says:

    Fishhead and Geri,

    You both are fools that should not be allowed to post misinformation as you have and Fishhead, you are basically ignorant.

    Obama had a Kenyan father – therefore he was a british citizen. There is also no bona fide certificate that states Obama was born in Hawaii, only that he was born and, since both parents were not American citizens, there is no way in hell obama is anything but an illegal alien put in office by a bunch of psychopathic dumber than dirt sons of Satan.

  117. Fishhead says:


    If you actually read up on Obama and his situation you might find out that the rumors people are spreading are simply just that. Rumors with no bearing.

    Straight from HAWAIIAN state gov…


    Look at (b)…
    Any certificate of Hawaiian birth issued heretofore under or by virtue of any law of the Territory of Hawaii or the State, shall be prima facie evidence of the facts therein stated.

    ANY certificate issued by the state is evidence.

    Also a quote for you that you obviously dont know about…

    Janice Okubo, director of communications for the Hawaii Department of Health: “If you were born in Bali, for example, you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate”. Another fact that refutes this specific claim is that the law allowing foreign-born children to obtain Hawaiian COLBs didn’t exist until 20 years after Obama was born, while Obama’s published COLB says his birth information was recorded four days after his birth in 1961, and explicitly states that he was born in Honolulu.

    Another note…

    Obama isnt the first president that had parents of dual citizenship. Look it up…

    Natural Born
    Natural born citizenship is the acquirement of citizenship at the moment of birth.

    There are only two types of natural born citizen:

    1.Native-born is being born within the territory of the state or commonwealth under the principle of jus soli,
    2.Attaining citizenship through the parents’ citizenship status under the principle of jus sanguinis.

    Jus Soli

    The principle of birthright citizenship gained through being born within a country is called jus soli (Latin for “right of soil”). It isn’t dependent on the citizenship of the parents.[2]

    In the United States the principle of jus soli goes back to before the creation of the Constitution. Territorial birthright citizenship was first formally established under English common law in the 1608 case of Calvin v. Smith (77 Eng. Rep. 377 (K.B. 1608)) whose decision was based upon the feudal relationship between a king or lord with their subjects in the early English feudal system.[3]

    The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution confirmed this birthright citizenship in the pertinent part of Section 1,

    “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” [Note 1]

    It has been presumed that any person born within the territory of the United States, including the children of illegal aliens, are granted citizenship under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. [2] The only exception is for foreign diplomats’ and officers’ children.[4 and Note 2]

    Jus Sanguinis

    The other natural born citizenship birthright is called jus sanguinis (Latin for “right of blood”). Jus sanguinis is based on having an ancestor or parent (often the father), who is a national or citizen of the state.[2]

    Jus sanguinis has even a longer history under English common law than jus soli. The concept of jus sanguinis dates back to at least 1351 when the statute de Natis Ultra Mare (25 Edw. 3, Stat. 2 (1351)) was passed. This statute became necessary due to King Edwards III’s overseas military campaigns. The statute goes beyond just granting citizenship to the children of those in the King’s service, to include “all children born beyond the sea whose fathers and mothers were at the faith and ligeance of the king of England, and provided that the mothers had gone outside the realm with the permission of their husbands, could inherit, i.e., that they were subjects.”[5]

    The concept of Jus sanguinis did influence the creation of the Constitution in the United States. The Naturalization Act of 1790 ((1 Stat. 103) March 26, 1790) clarifies this type of natural born citizen by declaring that “the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens.” Thusly the act establishes the United States citizenship of citizens’ children, who are born abroad, without the need for naturalization.[Note 3]

    Congress again confirmed jus sanguinis citizenship birthright in the Naturalization Act of 1795 (January 29, 1795 (1 Stat. 414)) “and the children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States.” While this leaves out the term natural-born, it does declare them to be citizens by-birth through their parents and therefore do not need the process of naturalization to become citizens.

    Its really a moot point since it seems he was in fact born here. Now if your willing to call all the elected officials liars then so be it. Just because you dont allow yourself to believe does not make something the way you want it.

    and here are the newspaper announcements…


    Next we’ll hear how this was a consriracy started in 1961.