Archive for the “Guns” Category

NRA CHALLENGES CONSTITUTIONALITY OF FEDERAL HANDGUN BAN FOR LAW ABIDING 18-20 YEAR OLDS

Wednesday, September 08, 2010

Fairfax, Va. — The NRA is challenging federal laws that prohibit law-abiding Americans eighteen through twenty years of age from legally purchasing a handgun through a federally licensed firearm dealer. The case was filed Tuesday evening in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Lubbock Division. James D’Cruz of Lubbock, TX is the plaintiff in this case.

The case is D’Cruz v. BATFE.

None of the other enumerated rights have an age restriction.

Comments 8 Comments »

Statement From NRA-PVF Chairman Chris W. Cox On The 2010 Nevada U.S. Senate Race

After careful consideration, the NRA-PVF announced today that it will not be endorsing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for re-election in the 2010 U.S. Senate race in Nevada.

Nice to see the NRA realize that “single issue” means more than just direct gun law votes.

Comments 3 Comments »

Joe has a question and that meme is spreading.

The NRA-ILA:

“the world is still waiting for any evidence that any gun control law on the planet has ever prevented individuals or regimes from committing crime.”

You would think that all those smart people who favor gun control would be able to answer that question. That they can’t tells you all you need to know.

Comments No Comments »

There are a couple of posts out today dealing with what gun for woman. I think the posts themselves are great. They both say the same thing: Try a bunch and get what works best for you.

But the comments! WHEW!

We need to drop the whole “new woman shooter” thing already. They are new shooters, period. Let’s not use sex to color expectations of a person’s capabilities. The idea that women are somehow less capable than men at ANYTHING other than writing their names in the snow is as dead as Teddy Kennedy. (pause to let JayG cheer.) Frankly I’m a little amazed by the neolithic thinking on display in some of those comments.

And that whole revolver is better than pistol for a first gun thing… Let me count the fail.

Myth: Revolvers are intuitive. (And somehow pistols aren’t)
Reality: ALL handguns are intuitive. Point, pull the trigger, BANG.

Myth: Revolvers are simpler to operate than Pistols.
Reality: Have you not seen a Glock?

Myth: It’s hard to rack the slide on a Pistol.
Reality: Frankly if some is too weak to rack a slide how are they going to deal with that double action trigger pull?

Myth: You have to practice failure drills with a pistol.
Reality: If your pistol fails that often you need to get it fixed.

Myth: You don’t have to train with a revolver.
Reality: You don’t have to train with any gun. Practice will certainly improve your shooting, but when it comes to a self defense handgun you don’t have to train at all, most people never do anyway. Refer back to that whole intuitive thing. Point open end at bad guy, pull trigger until he stops moving. If you like to train that’s fine, but don’t fool yourself into thinking that you’ll be more prepared than anyone else when the shit hits the fan. Cardboard doesn’t shoot back and until it does you’re just playing a game.

Myth: You can leave a revolver in a drawer for years then pull it out and fire it.
Reality: And you can’t do that with a Glock because? (and don’t dare say the magazine spring will weaken over time)

Myth: Revolvers are easier to clean.
Reality: If we’re leaving our guns in drawers for years why does ease of cleaning matter anyway? Cleaning is a fetish left over from the old days of corrosive primers. Modern guns don’t have to be cleaned unless the crud buildup impairs function. But if you have to clean, it’s pretty hard to make the case that a pistol is somehow more difficult to clean than a revolver.

Myth: A .38 Special snubbie revolver is a good first gun.
Reality: Are you TRYING to make people hate guns? If I had to pick one of the worst guns to actually shoot, a .38 Special snubbie revolver would be at the top of my list. NO ONE shoots a .38 snubbie for fun. If you recommend a .38 snubbie as a first gun it WILL go into a drawer for years because they won’t want to shoot it.

I personally don’t like Glocks, but that’s because I don’t shoot them as well as other guns, but I think a Glock 19 should be the first gun people try when they’re looking for a defensive handgun.

I’d no more recommend a revolver than I would a flint lock.

Comments 19 Comments »

Harry Reid.

Comments Comments Off

…but clearly Jesus is a .50 caliber guy.

When you have to reach out and smite someone…

(Oh, and BTW all you religion of peace apologists? The Christians won’t try to kill me for posting that picture.)

Comments 10 Comments »

Irish gun owners can now shoot intruders

Irish homeowners can now legally use guns to defend themselves if their homes are attacked under new legislation.

The new home defense bill has moved the balance of rights back to the house owner if his home is broken into “where it should always have been”, say top Irish police.

The police association of superintendents and inspectors, the AGSI, stated that “the current situation, which legally demands a house owner retreat from an intruder, was intolerable”.

I’m thinking they only did it because in the UK it’s illegal to defend yourself and they had to be different from the fecking British.

Whatever the reason, good for them.

Comments 1 Comment »

Joe does more to promote guns and explosives before breakfast than most do all year.

And yes, Idaho really is that lovely.

Booms and all.

Comments Comments Off

I love it when Joe Huffman thinks:

Let us suppose that in some alternate reality their is an evil NRA and the the good guys are the Brady Campaign. The opposite of a complete gun ban is not what the Brady Campaign claims as “any gun, anyplace, anytime”. It is mandatory gun ownership, training, and subsidies. Suppose Washington D.C. and Chicago had the evil NRA’s dream of a mandatory hour a day instruction and/or practice in firearm use from age 5 on up. All guns, ammo, and ranges for the mandatory practice are supplied at taxpayer expense. Furthermore all people were required to purchase at least one each of a shotgun, bolt gun, semi-auto rifle, semi-auto pistol, revolver, sub-machine gun, heavy machine gun, and (with subsidies for those who needed help) a mini-gun.

Sounds good to me!

Comments 7 Comments »

Monday, the Second Amendment Foundation filed suit in North Carolina seeking a permanent injunction against the governor, local officials and local governments from declaring states of emergency under which private citizens are prohibited from exercising their right to bear arms.

SAF is once again being represented by attorney Alan Gura, who led the legal effort in the McDonald case and also won the historic Heller ruling that overturned the District of Columbia handgun ban in 2008.

The SAF is kicking ass.

I’m a member, are you? Those anti-gun laws aren’t gonna sue themselves out of existence.

Comments 1 Comment »